I don’t think EVO II can promise that it’s members will leave resource boxes and links intact, so I doubt there’s any agreement of that sort in place.

But more often than not the links do stay intact, and the ones who don’t honor this usually end up auto-spinning your article sin gibberish that doesn’t make sense so their sites all suck anyways

However, for wider distribution and more backlinks you might want to broaden the topic of your articles so they get submitted to and accepted at more places.

Thanks,

Dan

Realistically-speaking all that really matters for competition is top 10-20 URLs, and this seems to be rather competitive term, since there’s been a lot of Google Dancing for it for years.

Any help is appreciated.
The Bow Tie Lady

I’m sure there will be some shady marketers who remove the resource box no matter what but is the agreement between EVO and UAW such that the resource box with back links remains intact?

The unique article wizard Plugin is free, as is the content it delivers.

Thanks,

Dan

Thank you for reply

What I prefer to do actually is both…

I submit to the top 4-5 directories and use Unique Article Wizard to make unique versions of a new set of articles and submit that to the network for increased exposure and backlinks.

I might even experiment with using UAW submissions to link to those top 4-5 published articles to build link juice to them, since that will result in better link power to destination sites linked to in the articles.

Thanks,

Dan