<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Good News For Unique Article Wizard Users!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/more-good-news-for-unique-article-wizard-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/more-good-news-for-unique-article-wizard-users/</link>
	<description>How to use Unique Article Wizard for advanced article marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 May 2010 18:50:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/more-good-news-for-unique-article-wizard-users/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/?p=174#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Hey Dan, like you said there will be some shady marketers who don&#039;t &quot;honor&quot; the links  and resource boxes.

I don&#039;t think EVO II can promise that it&#039;s members will leave resource boxes and links intact, so I doubt there&#039;s any agreement of that sort in place.

But more often than not the links do stay intact, and the ones who don&#039;t honor this usually end up auto-spinning your article sin gibberish that doesn&#039;t make sense so their sites all suck anyways</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dan, like you said there will be some shady marketers who don&#8217;t &#8220;honor&#8221; the links  and resource boxes.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think EVO II can promise that it&#8217;s members will leave resource boxes and links intact, so I doubt there&#8217;s any agreement of that sort in place.</p>
<p>But more often than not the links do stay intact, and the ones who don&#8217;t honor this usually end up auto-spinning your article sin gibberish that doesn&#8217;t make sense so their sites all suck anyways</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/more-good-news-for-unique-article-wizard-users/comment-page-1/#comment-275</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/?p=174#comment-275</guid>
		<description>So when EVO members use UAW articles, they are publishing the whole article with the resource box intact?  Or are they just using them as seed articles and then rewriting/spinning them and removing the resource box?

I&#039;m sure there will be some shady marketers who remove the resource box no matter what but is the agreement between EVO and UAW such that the resource box with back links remains intact?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So when EVO members use UAW articles, they are publishing the whole article with the resource box intact?  Or are they just using them as seed articles and then rewriting/spinning them and removing the resource box?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure there will be some shady marketers who remove the resource box no matter what but is the agreement between EVO and UAW such that the resource box with back links remains intact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
