Comments on: More Good News For Unique Article Wizard Users! http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/more-good-news-for-unique-article-wizard-users/ How to use Unique Article Wizard for advanced article marketing Wed, 22 Dec 2010 02:21:12 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5 By: teshia hardmon http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/more-good-news-for-unique-article-wizard-users/comment-page-1/#comment-318 teshia hardmon Wed, 22 Dec 2010 02:21:12 +0000 http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/?p=174#comment-318 they need to create in better system so each user of evo and uaw can better benefit from eachother like an agrreement to keep their links on other sites they need to create in better system so each user of evo and uaw can better benefit from eachother like an agrreement to keep their links on other sites

]]> By: Rick Imby http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/more-good-news-for-unique-article-wizard-users/comment-page-1/#comment-315 Rick Imby Wed, 15 Sep 2010 01:08:48 +0000 http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/?p=174#comment-315 I have used Evo ! and it normally leaves the resouce box in. It is more work to take the resource box out with evo 2 than to just leave it in. It is so automated that I do not believe most evo users will mess with taking the resource box out. I have tried evo a couple of times and it was still pretty glitchy the last time I used it, early in 2010. I believe it works better now but it is even more expensive like $157 a month. Rick I have used Evo ! and it normally leaves the resouce box in. It is more work to take the resource box out with evo 2 than to just leave it in. It is so automated that I do not believe most evo users will mess with taking the resource box out. I have tried evo a couple of times and it was still pretty glitchy the last time I used it, early in 2010. I believe it works better now but it is even more expensive like $157 a month.

Rick

]]> By: admin http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/more-good-news-for-unique-article-wizard-users/comment-page-1/#comment-280 admin Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:05:48 +0000 http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/?p=174#comment-280 Hey Dan, like you said there will be some shady marketers who don't "honor" the links and resource boxes. I don't think EVO II can promise that it's members will leave resource boxes and links intact, so I doubt there's any agreement of that sort in place. But more often than not the links do stay intact, and the ones who don't honor this usually end up auto-spinning your article sin gibberish that doesn't make sense so their sites all suck anyways Hey Dan, like you said there will be some shady marketers who don’t “honor” the links and resource boxes.

I don’t think EVO II can promise that it’s members will leave resource boxes and links intact, so I doubt there’s any agreement of that sort in place.

But more often than not the links do stay intact, and the ones who don’t honor this usually end up auto-spinning your article sin gibberish that doesn’t make sense so their sites all suck anyways

]]> By: Dan http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/more-good-news-for-unique-article-wizard-users/comment-page-1/#comment-275 Dan Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:38:38 +0000 http://uniquearticlewizardreview.org/?p=174#comment-275 So when EVO members use UAW articles, they are publishing the whole article with the resource box intact? Or are they just using them as seed articles and then rewriting/spinning them and removing the resource box? I'm sure there will be some shady marketers who remove the resource box no matter what but is the agreement between EVO and UAW such that the resource box with back links remains intact? So when EVO members use UAW articles, they are publishing the whole article with the resource box intact? Or are they just using them as seed articles and then rewriting/spinning them and removing the resource box?

I’m sure there will be some shady marketers who remove the resource box no matter what but is the agreement between EVO and UAW such that the resource box with back links remains intact?

]]>